Thursday, January 21, 2021

Errors spotted

 

Upon closer inspection of Asteria's free preview on Amazon we noticed an error in the first paragraph that is visible in full in the above photo. The text should've said:

"We try to offer an in-depth and detailed explanation so the reader has
a greater benefit from the information that is being presented. Besides
general interpretations based on astrological writings, we present our
own perspectives based on conclusions we have drawn from extensive
studies and experimental practical workings we have undertaken over
a considerable time. In this way, we hope that even those with little
or no astrological knowledge will find it easier for them to understand
the information presented within the pages of this book."

We apologize for overlooking it during the final checks we did. In fact, I assume entire responsibility for it, as neither Andres nor Nick have any blame in it. The fact is the site we used for constructing the entire manuscript glitched under the weight of the data we added to it right when Nick was editing that exact paragraph and it seems as though it failed to save Nick's adjustments in real time as usual. My job was to go over Nick's editing just in case such events occur, but it seems I was distracted at the time. Therefore, feel free to curse me if you're being bothered by that error. It is possible such minor errors exists here and there and I take full responsibility for them too.

The error was corrected and any more errors will be corrected accordingly. 

Edit: there is also the weird word spuch towards the end of page 1. According to Nick "Spuch is moon dust which comes out of the fanny of the Moon Goddess in Ancient Spanish tradition". That has been corrected as well, albeit without the use of a footnote containing Nick's definition.

Hate on, dum-dums!

The Great Gazoo

No comments:

Post a Comment